Absurd Entries in the OED
Following in the footsteps of A. J. Jacobs’ The Know-It-All in which the author devoted himself to reading the complete Encyclopedia Britannica, Ammon Shea has spent the past year reading the Oxford English Dictionary and will publish his experiences in Reading the OED this July. This first preview mentions some of the ‘absurd entries’ that he came across.
One example is a tautological pair that reads like a lexicographical snigger -
The entry for unpoetic gives no definition, but there is a note that tells the reader to ‘cf. next.’ The reader dutifully looks ahead to the next entry which is unpoetical, the definition of which reads ‘cf. prev.’
Others might be considered circumlocutive obfuscation, such as trondhjemite (”Any leucocratic tonalite, esp. one in which the plagioclase is oligoclase“) and disghibelline (”To distinguish, as a Guelph from a Ghibelline“). Yet ironically, when I posed the latter to my friend SW as a joke, she immediately started describing the differences between those terms - for as it happens, they are two warring factions from 12th and 13th century Italy…and she is a doctoral student specializing in art of the Italian renaissance. So maybe KA’s geology class will have covered trondhjemite (aka plagiogranite). For my part, I fondly remember getting Yggdrasil as a selection in a game of Balderdash and casting it as some kind of Yiddish, while of course knowing it as the World Tree from Norse mythology where Odin hung for nine days (cf. Gaiman’s American Gods).
