<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gray/matter &#187; argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stormlight.org/gray/matter/tag/argument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stormlight.org/gray/matter</link>
	<description>a mix of black and white</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 19:39:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Paul Graham: &#8220;How to Disagree&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.stormlight.org/gray/matter/2008/04/07/paul-graham-how-to-disagree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormlight.org/gray/matter/2008/04/07/paul-graham-how-to-disagree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormlight.org/gray/matter/2008/04/07/paul-graham-how-to-disagree/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning with the understated observation that &#8220;The web is turning writing into a conversation,&#8221; Graham expands on Shirky&#8217;s themes on online communication. One consequence of dialogue is disagreement, which outpaces agreement online by a sizeable margin. He sets out a hierarchy of disagreement, stepping from the base of name-calling through layers of common fallacies (ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning with the understated observation that &#8220;The web is turning writing into a conversation,&#8221; Graham expands on Shirky&#8217;s themes on online communication. One consequence of dialogue is <a href="http://www.xkcd.com/386/" target="_blank">disagreement</a>, which outpaces agreement online by a sizeable margin. He sets out a hierarchy of disagreement, stepping from the base of name-calling through layers of common fallacies (ad hominem, appeal to authority) on through more rarefied forms to ultimate direct refutation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html">How to Disagree</a></p>
<p>After years of seeing the same patterns of low-grade argument used in email, Usenet, forums, and now blog comment threads, it would be gratifying to see any evolution of disagreement along the lines Graham describes.</p>
<p>(The related articles &#8211; &#8220;<a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/essay.html" target="_blank">The Age of the Essay</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/say.html" target="_blank">What You Can&#8217;t Say</a>&#8221; &#8211; are also both interesting reading.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormlight.org/gray/matter/2008/04/07/paul-graham-how-to-disagree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

